Why OEMs should consider building their own Virtual Testing Platforms for Mechatronic systems!
In today’s fast-paced and competitive landscape, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in the industrial and mechatronics sectors are constantly seeking ways to streamline their operations and improve product quality. One solution that stands out is the development of in-house virtual testing platforms based on digital twin technology. By harnessing the power of digital twins for virtual prototyping and virtual commissioning, OEMs can revolutionize their approach to create full production lines and solutions for their clients. In this blog post, we’ll explore the compelling reasons why OEMs should consider building their own virtual testing platforms.
Unlocking the Power of Digital Twins
Accelerated Product Development
By employing digital twin technology, OEMs can speed up the development process and bring their products to market more quickly. Virtual prototyping enables engineers to test and optimize digital models of mechatronic systems under various conditions, identifying design flaws early on. This reduces the need for multiple iterations of physical prototypes, saving time and resources without compromising on quality.
Digital twin technology fosters a collaborative environment by integrating multiple engineering disciplines such as mechanics, electronics, and software. This interdisciplinary approach allows R&D teams to communicate more effectively and tackle complex mechatronical challenges together. Building a virtual testing platform in-house ensures that all departments work cohesively, resulting in more efficient and innovative solutions.
Virtual testing platforms that leverage digital twin technology can significantly reduce material and labor costs associated with physical prototypes. By simulating system behavior and performance in a virtual environment, engineers can identify potential issues early on, leading to fewer warranty claims and lower maintenance expenses. The cost savings realized can be passed on to clients or reinvested in R&D and innovation.
Improved System Performance
Digital twin technology can optimize the performance of mechatronic systems in full production lines by allowing engineers to evaluate various design alternatives and validate their functionality before implementation. Virtual commissioning helps fine-tune system performance, reducing the risk of errors and downtime during the actual commissioning process. Ultimately, this translates to better-performing production lines for OEM clients.
Greater Competitive Edge
By building their own virtual testing platforms based on digital twin technology, OEMs can gain a significant competitive advantage in the market. Clients are increasingly demanding faster, more cost-effective, and reliable solutions. By harnessing the power of digital twins for virtual prototyping and commissioning, OEMs can meet these demands while positioning themselves as leaders in the industry.
Digital twin technology and virtual testing platforms empower R&D teams to push the boundaries of what’s possible in mechatronics. By simulating complex systems, engineers can explore innovative design solutions and evaluate their feasibility before committing resources to their implementation. This fosters a culture of innovation and encourages R&D teams to develop groundbreaking advancements in mechatronics.
In conclusion, there’s a strong case for OEMs in the industrial and mechatronics sectors to invest in building their own virtual testing platforms based on digital twin technology. The benefits of virtual prototyping and virtual commissioning are undeniable, leading to accelerated product development, reduced costs, improved system performance, and enhanced innovation. By embracing this cutting-edge approach, OEMs can stay ahead in the competitive mechatronics landscape and deliver exceptional value to their clients.
Prespective excels in helping to set up these virtual testing platforms, focussing on companies that have mechatronics processes and concepts which are considered to be “difficult to integrate” in other simulation environments, for real time simulation.
Examples of this are, role to role processes, continuous versus discrete product flows, or a mix of these.
See our Philips case study an example!
So if you haven’t found a good fit for your company, because it didn’t fit in existing simulation environments, than send us a message!
Don’t believe our word alone on the use and setup of Digital Twin, also check out this resource.
Leave a ReplyWant to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!